Book Review: My Swordhand Is Singing


My Swordhand Is Singing
by Marcus Sedgwick
It’s almost more difficult to review a run-of-the-mill book than to review a bad one. There is nothing to rave about, nothing to rant about. Mostly, it’s difficult to think of something to say when you forget the book as soon as you’ve finished it. My Swordhand Is Singing is inoffensive, but for all its exciting subject matter it fails to elicit more than a yawn or two. It’s a struggle to imagine how Sedgwick made 17th-century vampires dull, but he has.
Perhaps Sedgwick’s biggest mistake was holding his characters at arm’s length and forbidding us from mustering anything more than a vague interest in their fates. To his credit, Sedgwick went out of his way to make sure that the backdrop was accurate. He’s quick in telling us that he researched 17th-century vampire lore and did his best to portray it accurately, which he’s probably done. But in doing so, he’s focused too much on the history and sacrifices the characters’ personalities in the shuffle. The only characters who manage to lift themselves from being mere ink on paper are the protagonist’s father (a drunk with a sword) and Sofia, the Gypsy girl who sings and slaps people. Even the hero’s horse was more interesting than most of the cast, which is a cruel fate for anyone.
The premise of the story is interesting enough. Tomas and his son Peter (whose names have taken me two paragraphs to recall), are woodcutters who are widely disliked by their clientele in the nearby town of Chust. When a distant friend of Tomas’ is found hanged in the forest, it’s the beginning of a series of deaths in the village that the inhabitants are quick to blame on the supernatural. Peter, being the age of impressionable rebellion, doesn’t know what to think, and proceeds to dally through most of the book. I half-hoped that the vampires would get him in the end, but Sedgwick isn’t quite that dark.
Sedgwick can’t seem to quell the urge to cross-examine his characters’ actions, just in case we couldn’t do that much for ourselves. More than once, we’re forced to read the feet-draggingly dull analysis of a young man with a drunk for a father. And, when that gets too depressing, the narration switches to other characters for a paragraph or two: Tomas, who spirals through a life of regret; Agnes, who can’t decide whether she loves Peter or not (this issue is later resolved by the vampires, who seem to dislike indecision as much as I do); and the occasional vampire victim. Instead of providing different angles to the story, the tactic was jarring and caused faint bouts of vertigo.
The final nail in the coffin (couldn’t resist) is Sedgwick’s mimicry of poetic prose. Many authors have managed elegant prose; many more have failed. Sedgwick attempts to force himself into the first group, but he relies so heavily on clichés that the result seems tacky. When the entire book reads like the back of a DVD, it’s hard to take anything seriously.
All in all, My Swordhand Is Singing isn’t a bad book, but it certainly isn’t a good book. It was well researched, but a mind for accuracy is Sedgwick’s only redeeming quality. Most of the characters are unlikeable, the prose is occasionally interesting but more frequently cookie-cutter, and the entire thing seems cramped. The story never moves beyond the village of Chust; but rather than providing the claustrophobia that small-town horrors usually create, it only makes the tale seem limited.
According to the book jacket flap, Sedgwick works in publishing. There are two very different skills involved in publishing a book: good writing and good polishing. Those who excel at the first can improve at the second with enough time and practice; but those who excel at the second will never master the first, because they’re more interested in expectation than inspiration. My Swordhand Is Singing covers the bare requirements of getting a book published, but it isn’t a writer’s work.
Excerpt (p. 12):
|
Rating: C-
[Amazon]
| my swordhand is singing review marcus sedgwick aydee book | ![]() |



hm….u hav nice points but remember this book is for kids
teeheelol said this on September 15, 2009 at 4:29 pm |
i would giv it a B
teeheelol said this on September 15, 2009 at 4:29 pm |
noooooooooooooooo this book is awsome
Anonymous said this on October 21, 2009 at 1:07 pm |
I love this book, this book is really really good in my opinion, i want mores stories on Peter, shame his father died tho :(
Anonymous said this on February 19, 2010 at 8:49 pm |
oh i am doin a school project on this book and i didnt no what happened its due in 2morrow you really helped thanks
tink said this on March 16, 2010 at 3:26 pm |
this book was kinda weird but u have a point it is well written but the author could have done a much better job
j12russell said this on April 30, 2010 at 11:49 pm |
I love this book!!!
It is the best book Sedgwick has written and is one of the best books I’ve ever read.
Anonymous said this on May 12, 2010 at 3:21 pm |
good review
Anonymous said this on July 26, 2010 at 8:56 pm |
I LOVE THIS BOOK IT’S THE BEST BOOK I HAVE EVER READ SO DON@T BE SO SILLY SAYING IT’S RUBBISH YOU COULD HAVE AT LEAST SAID SOMTING NICE ABOUT IT!!!!! if anyone else loved this book like me i recomened revolver by markus sedgwick.
Happy reading
$ammy
$ammy said this on October 16, 2010 at 2:45 am |
Who is Anna ??
Daisy said this on May 15, 2011 at 12:02 pm |
best book ever. it was sad and amazing in lots of ways
Anonymous said this on November 17, 2011 at 6:57 pm |